gum:rst
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
gum:rst [2021/11/24 04:57] sp1184 |
gum:rst [2021/11/24 05:13] sp1184 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 243: | Line 243: | ||
| In the following, W refers to the Writer (or speaker) and R refers to the addressed Reader (or hearer); S refers to a satellite and N refers to a nucleus in each relation (see also //Choosing between relations// further below for some tests to distinguish confusable relations): | In the following, W refers to the Writer (or speaker) and R refers to the addressed Reader (or hearer); S refers to a satellite and N refers to a nucleus in each relation (see also //Choosing between relations// further below for some tests to distinguish confusable relations): | ||
| + | |||
| + | → if a relation can only point forward by definition; ← if only backward; →← if either forward or backward; ^ for multi-nucleus relations. | ||
| * Presentational | * Presentational | ||
| - | * Antithesis | + | * Antithesis |
| - | * Background - S provides information to increase R's understanding of N | + | * Background |
| - | * Concession - R is meant to look past an incompatibility of N with S | + | * Concession |
| - | * Evidence - S provides evidence which increases R's belief in N | + | * Evidence |
| - | * Justify - S increases R's acceptance of W's right to say N | + | * Justify |
| - | * Motivation - S is meant to influence R's willingness to act according to N | + | * Motivation |
| * Preparation - S makes R more prepared for the appearance of N; three subtypes are recognized: | * Preparation - S makes R more prepared for the appearance of N; three subtypes are recognized: | ||
| - | * Preparation-Organization - is used specifically when the preparation is expressed in an explicit text organizing device such as a heading | + | * Preparation-Organization |
| - | * Preparation-Phatic - is used when the preparation merely amounts to W holding the floor, without otherwise contributing propositional content to the discourse, including backchanneling, | + | * Preparation-Phatic |
| - | * Preparation-Setup - covers all other forms of preparation | + | * Preparation-Setup |
| * Subject matter | * Subject matter | ||
| - | * Attribution - S provides the source of information in N | + | * Attribution |
| - | * Cause - S is the cause of N (and N is more prominent) | + | * Cause(→←) |
| - | * Circumstance - S details circumstances (often spatio-temporal) under which N applies | + | * Circumstance |
| - | * Condition - N occurs depending on S | + | * Condition |
| * Elaboration - S gives additional information about N. Two subtypes are recognized: | * Elaboration - S gives additional information about N. Two subtypes are recognized: | ||
| - | * Elaboration-Attribute - is used when S elaborates on a single phrase within N, rather than on the entire proposition in N | + | * Elaboration-Attribute |
| - | * Elaboration-Additional - is used in all other cases, when S is an elaboration on N as a whole | + | * Elaboration-Additional |
| - | * Evaluation - S provides an assessment of N by W (R does not have to share this assessment) | + | * Evaluation |
| - | * Manner - S indicates the manner in which N happens | + | * Manner |
| - | * Means - S indicates the means by which N happens | + | * Means (→←) |
| - | * Purpose - N is initiated or exists in order to realize S | + | * Purpose |
| - | * Question - N is the answer to the question posed by S | + | * Question |
| - | * Result - S is the result of N (or: N is the cause of S, and N is more prominent) | + | * Result |
| - | * Solutionhood - N is a solution to a problem presented by S | + | * Solutionhood |
| - | * Restatement-Partial - S partly realizes the same role and content as a previous N | + | * Restatement-Partial |
| * Multinuclear relations | * Multinuclear relations | ||
| - | * Contrast - W presents multiple Ns as incompatible, | + | * Contrast |
| - | * Disjunction - W presents multiple Ns which can be regarded as interchangeable alternatives | + | * Disjunction |
| - | * List - W presents multiple Ns in parallel which can be regarded as additive to one another (both X and Y), are of equal prominence, and do not exhibit a temporal sequence, contrast or alternative status. The elements should serve an equivalent purpose to each other (otherwise, see Joint) | + | * List (^) - W presents multiple Ns in parallel which can be regarded as additive to one another (both X and Y), are of equal prominence, and do not exhibit a temporal sequence, contrast or alternative status. The elements should serve an equivalent purpose to each other (otherwise, see Joint) |
| - | * Sequence - Multiple Ns form a temporally ordered sequence of events in order | + | * Sequence |
| - | * Restatement-Repetition - Multiple Ns realize the same role and content | + | * Restatement-Repetition |
| - | * Same-unit - indicates a discontinuous discourse unit (this is not a discourse relation) | + | * Same-unit |
| - | * Joint - any other collection of discourse units of equal prominence at the same level of hierarchy, but of disparate (non-equivalent) discourse purpose compared to each other | + | * Joint (^) - any other collection of discourse units of equal prominence at the same level of hierarchy, but of disparate (non-equivalent) discourse purpose compared to each other |
| ===Complete trees=== | ===Complete trees=== | ||
gum/rst.txt · Last modified: 2022/01/03 18:45 by amir
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution 4.0 International
